The Pregnancy Diagnosis in Buffalo Species: Laboratory Methods

Authors

  • Olimpia Barbato Department of Biopathological Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy; 2Agricultural Research Council - Animal Production Research Centre (CRA-PCM), via Salaria, 31, Monterotondo (Rome), Italy
  • Vittoria Lucia Barile Department of Biopathological Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy; 2Agricultural Research Council - Animal Production Research Centre (CRA-PCM), via Salaria, 31, Monterotondo (Rome), Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.05

Keywords:

Pregnancy marker, hormone, progesterone, estrone sulfate, PAG, embryonic mortality

Abstract

Pregnancy diagnosis plays an important role in the reproduction management of ruminants since embryonic mortality has a substantial impact on the fertility of a herd. Most of the embryonic losses occur during the first days after fertilization and during the process of implantation. So it is very important to discriminate, with an early pregnancy diagnosis, non-pregnant from pregnant animals. Hormone analysis to detect pregnancy may be utilize as a more simple technique as an alternative of rectal palpation or ultrasound. In the last years, a large polymorphic family of placenta-expressed proteins has been discovered in ruminant species and used for pregnancy diagnosis. Members of this family are named pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG), being synthesized in the mono-and binucleate cells of the ruminant’s trophectoderm. Part of them is released in the maternal blood circulation where they can be assayed by different laboratory techniques. Due to large variety of expressed molecules and to large variations in the post-translational processing of the PAG, different immuno-systems present different ability to quantify the PAG released in blood. The assay of PAG can also bring very interesting information for researchers working in programs focused on the study of embryonic and fetal mortalities, as well as on embryo biotechnology, animal nutrition or infections diseases resulting in pathologies affecting the pregnancy.

References

Pawshe CH, Rao Apparao, Totey Sm. Ultrasonographic imaging. Theriogenology 1994; 41 (3): 697-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90179-M DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90179-M

Agarwal SK and Tomer OS. Pregnancy Diagnosis. Indian Vet Res Instit Res Publ 1998; 37: 41-49.

Karen A, Darwish S, Ramoun A, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonographiy. Theriogenology 2007; 68: 1150-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.011

Vallaincourt D. and Harvey D. The theory of relativity. Can Vet J 1990; 31 (5): 334-35.

Romano JE, Magee D. Applications of transrectal uktrasonographiy in cow/heifer reproduction. In: Annual Food Conference. Conception to parturition: Fertility in Texas Beef Cattle College of Vet Med 2-3 Texas A&M University 2001; pp. 99-104.

Glatzel PS, Ali A, Gilles M, Fiedlak, C. Zur faststellung der fruhtrachtigkert bei 30 wasserbuffelfarsen (Babalus bubalis) durch die transrektale palpation unit und ohne ultrasonographie. Tier¨arztl. Umschau 2000; 55: 329-32.

Ali A. and Fahmy S. Ultrasonographic fetometry. Animal Repro Sci 2008; 106: 90-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.04.010

Arora RC, Pandey RS. Changes in peripheral plasma. Endocrinol 1982; 48(3): 403-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(82)90153-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(82)90153-8

Perera BAOM, Pathiraja N, Abeywardena SA, Motha MXS, Abeywardena H. Early pregnancy diagnosis. Vet Record 1980; (2): 104-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.106.5.104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.106.5.104

Arora RC, Batra SK, Pahwa GS, Jain GC, Pandey RS. Milk progestrone levels. Theriogenology 1980; 13(4): 249-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(80)90087-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(80)90087-4

Batra SK, Prakash BS, Madan ML. Relationship of progesterone. Trop Anim Hlth Prod 1993; 25: 94.

Gupta RH, Prakash BS. Milk progesterone. Bu Vet J 1990; 146(6): 563-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(90)90061-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(90)90061-7

Kaul V, Praska BS. Application of milk progesterone estimation. Trop. Anim. Health Prod 1994; 26(83): 187-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02241083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02241083

Prakash BS, Madan ML. Influence of gestation. Trop Anim Health Prod 1993; 25: 94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02236514 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236514

Eissa HM, el Belely MS, Ghoneim IM, Ezzo OH. Plasma progesterone. Vet Res 1995; 4(26): 310-18.

Hung NM, Prakash BS. Influence of gestation.

Wooding FB, Roberts RM, Green JA. Light and electron microscope immunocytochemical. Placenta 2005; 26: 807-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2004.10.014

Zoli AP, Beckers JF, Wouters-Ballman P, Closset J, Falmagne P, Ectors F. Purification and characterization. Biol Reprod 1991; 45: 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.1.1

Sousa NM, Remy B, El Amiri B, et al. Characterization of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002; 42: 227-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002021

Klisch K, Sousa NM, Beckers JF, Leiser R, Pich A. Pregnancy-associated glycoprotein -1, -6, -7 and -17. Mol Reprod Dev 2005; 71: 453-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20296

Xie S, Green JA, Bao B, et al. Multiple pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:1384-1393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.6.1384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.6.1384

El Amiri B, Remy B, De Sousa NM, Beckers JF. Isolation and characterization of eight pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Reprod Nutr Dev 2004; 44: 169-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2004025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2004025

Garbayo JM, Remy B, Alabart JL, et al. Isolation and partial characterization. Biol Reprod 1998; 58: 109-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.109

Barbato O, Sousa NM, Klisch K, et al. Isolation of new pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Res Vet Sci 2008; 85: 457-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.01.004

Kiewisz K, Sousa NM, Beckers JF, Panasiewics G, Gizejewskiz, Szafranska B. Identification of multiple pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 112: 229-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.021

Huang F, Cockrell DC, Stephenson TR, Noyes JH, Sasser RG. Isolation, purification Biol Reprod 1999; 61: 1056-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod61.4.1056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod61.4.1056

Xie S, Low BG, Nagel RJ, et al. Identification of the major pregnancy-specific antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 10247-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.22.10247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.22.10247

Guruprasad K, Blundell TL, Xie S, et al. Comparative modelling. Protein Eng 1996; 9: 849-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/9.10.849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/9.10.849

Xie S, Green JA, Bixby JB, et al. The diversity and evolutionary relationship of the pregnancy-associated glycoproteins, an aspartic proteinase subfamily consisting of many trophoblast-expressed genes. Proc Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 12809-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.24.12809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.24.12809

Green JA, Xie S, Quan X, et al. Pregnancy-associated bovine. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1624-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.6.1624

Garbayo JM, Green JA, Manikklam M, et al. Caprine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 57: 311-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200012)57:4<311::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-F DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200012)57:4<311::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-F

Sousa NM, Ayad A, Beckers JF, Gajewski Z. Pregnancy-associated glycoproteins. J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 57(8): 153-71.

Zoli AP, Guibault LA, Delahaut P, Ortiz WB, Beckers JF. Radioimmunoassay of a bovine. Biol Reprod 1992; 46: 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.1.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.1.83

Szenci O, Taverne MAM, Sulon J, et al. Evaluation of false ultrasonographic pregnancy. Vet Rec 1998; 142: 304-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.12.304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.12.304

Karen A, El Amiri B, Beckers JF, Sulon J, Taverne MAM, Szenci O. Comparison of accuracy Theriogenology 2006; 66: 314-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.11.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.11.017

Gonzalez F, Sulon J, Garbayo JM, et al. Early pregnancy diagnosis. Theriogenology 1999; 52: 717-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00165-X

Osborn DA, Beckers JF, Sulon J, et al. Use of glycoprotein assays. J WILDL Manage 1996; 60(2): 388-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3802240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3802240

Carvalho AF, Klisch K, Miglino MA, Pereira FT, Bevilacqua E. Binucleate trophoblast giant cells. J Morphol 2006; 267(1): 50-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10387

Barbato O, Sousa NM, Malfati A, et al. Concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in Water buffaloes females (Bubalus bubalis) during pregnancy and postpartum periods. In: O’Leary M., Arnett J. (Eds), Pregnancy Protein Research, Nova Science Publishers, Washington DC, 2009; pp. 123-34.

FAOSTAT [homepage on the Internet]. FAOSTAT, DAWNLOAD Data, Production, Live Animal; updated 2012 february 23: Available from: http//faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html#DOWLOAD

Downloads

Published

2012-08-29

How to Cite

Barbato, O., & Barile, V. L. (2012). The Pregnancy Diagnosis in Buffalo Species: Laboratory Methods. Journal of Buffalo Science, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.02.05

Issue

Section

Theme Issue - Use of Reproductive Techniques in Buffalo