Territorial – Means a Spatial, or a New Approach to the Old Criminological Problem Solving

Authors

  • Dmitry V. Bakharev Yugra State University, 16, Chekhova str., Khanty-Mansiysk, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, 628012, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2019.08.04

Keywords:

Causes of crime, territorial differences in crime rates, spatial analysis.

Abstract

The article presents a new approach to the possibilities of using the method of analysis of patterns of territorial differences formation in crime rates in regions of the same country in order to expand the understanding of crime causative complex as a whole. The author proves that the effectiveness of territorial approach to crime causes understanding will reach its greatest extent when it is a criminological analysis of territorial-spacial systems functioning, a revelation of their destabilizing factors, sources of disorganization and social tension. But this requires a preliminary solution to the problem of identifying the patterns of territorial socio-economic systems functioning, that the author proposes to do on the basis of the "New Economic Geography" modern achievements. For such an approach, the name "spatial analysis of causative crime complex" is claimed. This analysis, carried with reference to some regions of Central Federal District of Russia, demonstrated the received results importance for a better mechanism of theoretical understanding of crime existence in society. In particular, the conclusion was made that the main reason of crime rates increasing within the territorial socio-economic system (specifically, the Russian Federation region) is the imbalance between theoretically estimated potential of socio-economic development of a definite region at a certain stage of society development and actual vector and dynamics of such development in reality.

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. 2015. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Moscow: AST.

Bakharev, D. 2011. The Use of Integral Characteristics in the Study of Socio-economic Factors of the Territorial Differentiation of Crime Rate: History and Modern Perspectives. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 1, 33-41.

Bakharev, D. 2013. The Character of Modern Demographic Processes in Russia and Taking them into Consideration when Studying of the Causes of Crime. Materials of the VIII Russian Congress of Criminal Law, on May 30-31, 2013. Moscow: Yurlitinform.

Bakharev, D. 2015a. Spatial Analysis of Crime Causes. Part 1. Theoretical Principles and Methodology of Implementation. Library of Criminal Law and Criminology, 3, 96-108.

Bakharev, D. 2015b. Spatial Analysis of Causes of Criminality: Theoretical Background, Methodology, Implementation Experience. Advances in Criminology Research. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Bakharev, D. 2016a. Spatial Analysis of the Causal Complex of Crime. St.Petersburg: Publishing House “Juridical Center”.

Bakharev, D. 2016b. Spatial Thinking in Criminology. Part I. Theoretical Background and Methodological Principles of the Application of Spatial Analysis Methods in the Study of the Crime Determination Mechanism. Law and Politics, 3, 306-312.

Bakharev, D. 2016с. Spatial Thinking in Criminology. Part II. Methodology of Spatial Analysis of the Russian Regions’ Socio-Economic Development. Law and Politics, 4, 434-440.

Bluvshtein, Y. 1985. On the Causation of Criminality. Criminology and Criminal Policy. Moscow: The USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House.

Friedmann, J. 1966. Regional development policy: A case study of Venezuela. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fujita, M. Krugman, P. and Venable, A.J. 1999. The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001

Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. 2003. The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future. Papers in Regional Science, 83, 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0

Goldstone, D. 2014. Why Europe? The Rise of the West in the World History, 1500-1850. Moscow: Publishing house of Gaidar Institute.

Kolomak, E. 2013. Uneven Spatial Development in Russia: Explanation of the New Economic Geography. Issues of Economics, 2, 132-149. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-132-150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-132-150

Kudryavtsev, V. 2013. Social Deviations. Selected Works on Social Sciences. Vol.2. Moscow: The science.

Kuznetsova, O. 2013. The Pyramid of Factors of the Regional Socio-Economic Development. Issues of Economics, 2, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-121-131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-2-121-131

Orekhov, V. 1982. Social Planning and Crime Prevention. Dissertation ... Doctor of Juridical Sciences. Leningrad.

Prozumentov, L. and Shesler, A. 2014. National Scientific Concepts of Crime Causes. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 1, 49-58.

Raska, E. 1985. The Fight Against Crime and the Social Management. Theoretical and Methodical Aspects. Tallinn: Eesti raamat.

Spiridonov, L. and Leps, A. 1985. Theoretical Issues of the Study of Crime Territorial Differences. Theoretical Issues of the Study of Crime Territorial Differences, 725, 3-18.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-11

How to Cite

Bakharev, D. V. (2019). Territorial – Means a Spatial, or a New Approach to the Old Criminological Problem Solving. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 8, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2019.08.04

Issue

Section

Articles