How Does it Feel? Factors Predicting Emotions and Perceptions Towards Sexual Harassment


  • Ronit Peled Laskov Criminology Department, Ashkelon Academic College, Israel
  • Irit Ein-Tal Criminology department, Western Galilee College, Israel
  • Lutzy Cojocaru Economics department, Ashkelon Academic College, Israel



Sexual harassment, perceptions, emotions, gender differences, sexual schemas.


The present research addresses the effect of different variables on emotions and on perceptions held by research participants vis-à-vis situations that could be construed as sexual harassment. A total of 833 Israeli students participated in the study and use was made of a Sexual Harassment Definition Questionnaire (SHDQ). It was found that emotions aroused due to behaviour that is perceived as sexual harassment depend on variables such as age and gender of perpetrator and victim. More negative feelings were identified towards behaviours suggestive of sexual harassment among women than men, and among younger than older individuals, principally in situations where the perpetrator is a man. Situations in which the perpetrator and the victim were of the same gender were experienced as less flattering than those in which the gender was different. It was also found that women above the age of 40 perceived behaviour in which a woman related to a man or a woman in sexual terms as a situation with a higher potential for sexual harassment than one in which a man related to a woman or a man in a similar way. The findings show the extent to which social perceptions and emotions relating to sexual harassment are dynamic and context-dependent.


Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest. A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194. DOI:

Angelone, D. J., Mitchell, D., & Carola, K. (2009). Tolerance of sexual harassment: A laboratory paradigm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 949–962. DOI:

Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(19), 1719-1734. DOI:

Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 426-436. DOI:

Bryden, P. J., & Fletcher, P. C. (2007). Personal safety practices, beliefs and attitudes of academic faculty on a small university campus: Comparison of males and females. College Student Journal, 41, 613–622.

Buchanan, N. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2008). Effects of racial and sexual harassment on work and the psychological well-being of African American women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 137–151. DOI:

Buddie, M. (2012). Student Perceptions of Peer Sexual Harassment: The “Where” and the “How” Matter More than the “Who”. Notre Dame: Department of Sociology University

Calkins, S. A., & Bell, M. A. (Eds). (2010). Child Development at the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition. Human Brain Development. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. DOI:

Chakravarty, A. (2010). The creative brain- Revisiting concepts. Medical hypothesis, 74 (3), 606-612. DOI:

Cortina, L. M., & Berdahl, J. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 469–497). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI:

Cortina, M.S., & Wasti, S.A. (2005). Profiles in Coping: Responses to Sexual Harassment Across Persons, Organizations, and Cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 182–192. DOI:

Crittenden, C. (2009). Examining attitudes and perceptions of sexual harassment on a university campus: what role do myths and stereotypes play? (Master's thesis). Chattanooga: The University of Tennessee.

DeSouza, E., & Fansler, G. (2003). Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members. Sex Roles, 48, 529–542. DOI:

DeSouza, E., & Solberg, J. (2004). Women’s and men’s reactions to man-to-man sexual harassment: Does the sexual orientation of the victim matter? Sex Roles, 50, 623–639. DOI:

Dionisi, A. M., & Barling, J. (2018). It hurts me too: Examining the relationship between male gender harassment and observers’ well-being, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 303-319. DOI:

Dionisi, A. M., Barling, J., & Dupré, K. E. (2012). Revisiting the comparative outcomes of workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 398–408. DOI:

Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550-553. DOI:

Englander, E. (2013). Bullying and Cyberbullying. Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2014). Violence Against Women: An EU-wide survey [on line] retrieved December 15th 2014-vaw-survey-main-results_en.pdf.

Fairchild, K. (2010). Context Effects on Women’s Perceptions of Stranger Harassment. Sexuality & Culture, 14, 191-216. DOI:

Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 338–357. DOI:

Fitzgerald, L.F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C.L., Gelfand, M.J. and Magley, V.J. (1997). Antecedents and Consequences of Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Test of an Integrated Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578-589. DOI:

Foulis, D., & McCabe, M.P. (1997).Sexual harassment: Factors affecting attitudes and perceptions. Sex Roles, 37, 773-798. DOI:

Gagnon, J. H. (1973). Scripts and the coordination of sexual conduct. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 21, 27-59.

Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual Conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.

George, W. H., Stoner, S. A., Davis, K. C., Lindgren, K. P., Norris, J., & Lopez, P. A. (2006). Postdrinking sexual perceptions and behaviors toward another person: Alcohol expectancy set and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 282-292. DOI:

Glazerman, M., Maman, M., & Rabinerson, D. (2008). Sexual Harassment in the Medical System, HaRefua, 147, 702-706 (in Hebrew). DOI:

Gouws, A., & Kritzinger, A. (2007). Dealing with sexual harassment at institutions of higher learning: Policy implementation at a South African university. Unisa press, 21, 68-84. DOI:

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice Hall.

Graham, K., Bernards, S., Abbey, A., Dumas, T. M., & Wells, S. (2017). When women do not want it: Young female bargoers' experiences with and responses to sexual harassment in social drinking contexts. Violence Against Women, 23 (12), 1419-1441. DOI:

Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Haselton, M. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 34-47. DOI:

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley. DOI:

Hendrix, W. H., Rueb, J. D., & Steel, R. P. (1998). Sexual harassment and gender differences. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 235–252.

Henry, J., & Meltzoff, J. (1998). Perception of sexual harassment as a function of target’s response type and observer’s sex. Sex Roles, 39, 253-271. DOI:

Herbert, R. K. (1986). Say “thank you” – Or something. American Speech, 61, 76–88. DOI:

Herbert, R. K. (1989). The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. In Oleksy, W. (ed.), Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI:

Herbert, R. K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society, 19(2), 201-224. DOI:

Jackson, R. A., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace revisited: Influences on sexual harassment by gender. Public Administration Review, 64, 705–717. DOI:

Kamir, A. (2009). This Disturbs Me – Living with the Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuhad and Carmel Publishers (in Hebrew).

Katz, R. C., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34, 35–42. DOI:

Kavanaugh, P. R. (2013). The continuum of sexual violence: Women's accounts of victimization in urban nightlife. Feminist Criminology, 8, 20-39. DOI:

Kimble, K. M. K., Farnum, K. S., Wiener, R. L., Allen, J., Nuss, G. D., & Gervais, S. J. (2016). Differences in the eyes of the beholders: The roles of subjective and objective judgments in sexual harassment claims. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 319 –336. DOI:

Knesset Research and Information Center, (2018). Data on Sexual Harassment. Extracted 19 February 2019 from (in Hebrew)

Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55– 68. DOI:

Lopez, S.H., Hodson, R., & Roscigno, V.J. (2009). Power, Status and Abuse at work: General and Sexual Harassment Compared. Journal of the Sociological Quarterly, 50, 3-27. DOI:

Macmillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the Streets: Harassment and Perceptions of Safety among Women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(3), 306-322. DOI:

Marks, M. A., & Nelson, E. S. (1993). Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behaviors. Sex Roles, 28, 207–217. DOI:

McCabe, M. P., & Hardman, L. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 719-740. DOI:

Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University Press.

Merkin, R. S. (2012). Sexual Harassment Indicators: The Socio-Cultural and Cultural Impact of Marital Status, Age, Education, Race, and Sex in Latin America. Intercultural Communication Studies, 21, 154-172.

Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2016). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script based approach. Journal of Annals of the International Communication Association, 19, 49-92. DOI:

Mischel, W. (1966). A social learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 57–81). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Mor, A. (2009). Preliminary Assessment of the Magnitude and Characteristics of Exposure to Sexual Violence Among Women in Israel. Social Issues in Israel, 7, 46-65 (in Hebrew).

Mor, A. (2011). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Extent, Characteristics, and Gender Perceptions. Social Issues in Israel, 11, 159-184 (in Hebrew).

Mor, A. (2017). A Threatening Daily Reality – Roadside Sexual Harassment and Its Implications. Social Issues in Israel, 23, 6-28 (in Hebrew).

O'Connor, M., Gutek, B. A., Stockdale, M., Geer, T. M., & Melancon, R. (2004). Explaining sexual harassment judgements: Looking beyond gender of the rater. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 69-95. DOI:

O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bates, C. A., & Lean, E. R. (2009). Sexual harassment at work: A decade (plus) of progress. Journal of Management, 35, 503–536. DOI:

Page, T. E., Pina, A., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016). "It was only harmless banter!" The development and preliminary validation of the moral disengagement in sexual harassment scale. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 254-273. DOI:

Parisi, C., & Wogan, P. (2006). Compliment topics and gender. Women and Language, 29(2), 21-28.

Prevention of Sexual Harassment Law, 5758 – 1998, Rulebook, Section 166 (in Hebrew).

Reese, L.A., & Lindenberg, K.E. (2005). Gender, age, and sexual harassment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 325-352. DOI:

Robinson, K. H. (2005). Reinforcing hegemonic masculinities through sexual harassment: Issues of identity, power and popularity in secondary schools. Gender and Education, 17, 19–37 DOI:

Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D-H., & Sackett, P.R. (2001). A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914-922. DOI:

Rubin, L.J., & Borgers, S.B. (1990). Sexual Harassment in universities during the 1980s. Sex Roles, 23, 397-411. DOI:

Runtz, M. J., & O’Donnell, C. W. (2003). Students’ perceptions of sexual harassment: Is it harassment only if the offender is a man and the victim is a woman? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 963–982. DOI:

Russell, B. L. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565-573. DOI:

Shechory Bitton, M., & Ben Shaul, D. (2013). Perceptions and attitudes to sexual harassment: an examination of sex differences and the sex composition of the harasser-target dyad. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2136-2145. DOI:

Sipe, S. R., Johnson, C. D., & Fisher, D. K. (2009). University students' perceptions of sexual harassment in the workplace: A view through rose- colored lenses. Equal Opportunities International, 28, 336-350. DOI:

Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2010). Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 969–988. DOI:

Stockdale, M. S., Gandolfo Berry, C., Schneider, R. W., & Cao, F. (2004).

Perceptions of the sexual harassment of men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(2), 158-167. DOI:

Stockdale, M. S., & Ohse, D. M. (2008). Age comparisons in workplace sexual theoretical perspectives. Sex Roles, 57, 579-592. DOI:

Strouse, J. S., Goodwin, M. P., & Roscoe, B. (1994). Correlates of attitudes toward sexual harassment among early adolescents. Sex Roles, 31, 559–577. DOI:

Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1993). College men’s and women’s reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles, 29, 371–385. DOI:

Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hobken, NJ: John Wiley.

Wayne, J. H., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, K. M. (2001). Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 179–187. DOI:

Wickens, C.M., Wiesenthal, D.L., Flora, D.B., & Flett, G.L. (2011). Understanding Driver Anger and Aggression: Attributional Theory in the Driving Environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 354-370. DOI:

Wiener, R. L., & Vardsveen, T. C. (2018). The objective prong in sexual harassment: What is the standard? Law and Human Behavior, 42(6), 545-557. DOI:

Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127-162. DOI:

Wilson, F. (2000). The subjective experience of sexual harassment: Cases of students. Journal of Human Relations, 8, 1081-1098. DOI:




How to Cite

Laskov, R. P., Ein-Tal, I., & Cojocaru, L. (2022). How Does it Feel? Factors Predicting Emotions and Perceptions Towards Sexual Harassment. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 37–51.