Evaluation and Comparison of Patterns of Maternal Complications Using Generalized Linear Models of Count Data Time Series

Authors

  • Collins Odhiambo Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Strathmore University, Ole Sangale Road, Madaraka, P.O. Box 59857 – 00200, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Freda Kinoti Department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.05

Keywords:

Maternal complications, Count Data time series, Trends, Goodness-of-fit, Conditional distribution.

Abstract

Studying patterns of maternal complications is critical before, during and after childbirth. However, there is limited information on comparative trends of different maternal complications, particularly, in a resource-limited setting. In this study, we fit six different types of maternal complications namely ante-partum haemorrhage (APH), eclampsia, obstructed labour, post-partum haemorrhage (PPH), ruptured uterus and sepsis to time series generalized linear model. We systematically compare the performance of the model in light of real data by checking its flexibility and serial correlation and the conditional distribution. We then, compute model fitting, assessment and prediction analysis for each maternal complication. Additionally, we provide a comparative review of the results by assessing the effect of intervention 1: basic emergency obstetric and new-born care (BEmONC) and intervention 2: comprehensive emergency obstetric and new-born care (CEmONC) services on trends in maternal complications. Results show that women with APH, eclampsia and obstructed labour at the time of delivery are significantly high. Maternal complication did not statistically vary by counties. The results of count GLM for APH showed presence of Intervention1 (BEmONC) reduces APH by a factor -0.189 (LCI =- 0.298, UCI= -0.0805) while CEmONC was not statistically significance. Similar inference is registered by PPH i.e. Intervention1 (BEmONC) is -0.17 (LCI =-0.258, UCI= - 0.082) while CEmONC remains insignificant. This can be interpreted to mean that public health facilities only require the basic minimum (BEmONC) infrastructure to cub APH and PPH. Mothers with sepsis and eclampsia were significantly more likely to experience maternal and perinatal deaths when delivering at facilities that lack BEmONC. Caregivers, who perform obstetric and maternal care, need be alert of maternal complications associated with PPH and obstructed labour. Introduction of BEmONC and CEmONC packages in maternal and neonatal clinics improved performance of caregivers in reducing maternal and pediatric complications and mortality.

References

Iyengar K, Yadav R, Sen S. Consequences of maternal complications in women's lives in the first postpartum year: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 2012; 30(2): 226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v30i2.11318

Zureick-Brown S, Newby H, Chou D, Mizoguchi N, Say L, Suzuki E, Wilmoth J. Understanding global trends in maternal mortality. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2013; 39(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/3903213

Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, Templin T. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet 2014; 384(9947): 980-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000472714.57328.86

Kishowar Hossain AHM. Utilization of antenatal care services in Bangladesh: an analysis of levels, patterns, and trends from 1993 to 2007. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2010; 22(4): 395-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539510366177

Dasari P. Maternal mortality and its relationship to emergency obstetric care (EmOC) in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Obstetric Medicine 2015; 8(2): 86-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X15575949

Yego F, D’Este C, Byles J, Williams JS, Nyongesa P. Risk factors for maternal mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014; 14(1): 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-38

Warren C, Mwangi A, Oweya E, Kamunya R, Koskei N. Safeguarding maternal and newborn health: improving the quality of postnatal care in Kenya. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2009; 22(1): 24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzp050

Czado C, Gneiting T, Held L. Predictive model assessment for count data. Biometrics 2009; 65(4): 1254-1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01191.x

Demidenko E. Mixed models: theory and applications with R. John Wiley & Sons 2013.

Fokianos K, Rahbek A, Tjøstheim D. Poisson autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2009; 104(488): 1430-1439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08270

Fokianos K, Tjøstheim D. Log-linear Poisson autoregression. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2011; 102(3): 563-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2010.11.002

Gold KJ, Mozurkewich EL, Puder KS, Treadwell MC. Maternal complications associated with stillbirth delivery: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2016; 36(2): 208-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2015.1050646

Fokianos K, Fried R. Interventions in INGARCH processes. Journal of Time Series Analysis 2010; 31(3): 210-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2010.00657.x

Fokianos K, Fried R. Interventions in log-linear Poisson autoregression. Statistical Modelling 2012; 12(4): 299-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X1201200401

Liboschik T. Modelling count time series following generalized linear models. PhD Thesis TU Dortmund University 2016.

Liboschik T, Kerschke P, Fokianos K, Fried R. Modelling interventions in INGARCH processes. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 2016; 93(4): 640-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2014.949250

Sibai BM. Eclampsia: VI. Maternal-perinatal outcome in 254 consecutive cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 163(3): 1049-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)91123-T

Mukherjee S, Bhide A. Antepartum haemorrhage. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 2008; 18(12): 335-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2008.09.005

Mukherjee S, Arulkumaran S. Post-partum haemorrhage. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 2009; 19(5): 121-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2009.01.005

Vincent JL. The clinical challenge of sepsis identification and monitoring. PLoS Medicine 2016; 13(5): e1002022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002022

Kidanto HL, Mwampagatwa I, Van Roosemalen J. Uterine rupture: a retrospective analysis of causes, complications and management outcomes at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research 2012; 14(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v14i3.9

Backes CH, Markham K, Moorehead P, Cordero L, Nankervis CA, Giannone PJ. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. Journal of Pregnancy 2011; 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/214365

Neilson JP, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour: reducing maternal death and disability during pregnancy. British Medical Bulletin 2003; 67(1): 191-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg018

Downloads

Published

2019-07-08

How to Cite

Odhiambo, C., & Kinoti, F. (2019). Evaluation and Comparison of Patterns of Maternal Complications Using Generalized Linear Models of Count Data Time Series. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 8, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2019.08.05

Issue

Section

General Articles