Analysis of Recurrent Events with Associated Informative Censoring: Application to HIV Data

Authors

  • Jonathan Ejoku Strathmore Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Strathmore University, Madaraka Estate, Ole Sangale Road, P.O. Box 59857, 00200, City Square, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Collins Odhiambo Strathmore Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Strathmore University, Madaraka Estate, Ole Sangale Road, P.O. Box 59857, 00200, City Square, Nairobi, Kenya
  • Linda Chaba Strathmore Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Strathmore University, Madaraka Estate, Ole Sangale Road, P.O. Box 59857, 00200, City Square, Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.03

Keywords:

Recurrent events, Loss to follow-up, HIV, Prentice, Williams and Peterson Gap-Time, Informative censoring

Abstract

In this study, we adapt a Cox-based model for recurrent events; the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total -Time (PWP-TT) that has largely, been used under the assumption of non-informative censoring and evaluate it under an informative censoring setting. Empirical evaluation was undertaken with the aid of the semi-parametric framework for recurrent events suggested by Huang [1] and implemented in R Studio software. For validation we used data from a typical HIV care setting in Kenya. Of the three models under consideration; the standard Cox Model had gender hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (p-value=0.165), Andersen-Gill had HR 0.46 (with borderline p-value=0.054) and extended PWP TT had HR 0.22 (p-value=0.006). The PWP-TT model performed better as compared to other models under informative setting. In terms of risk factors under informative setting, LTFU due to stigma; gender [base=Male] had HR 0.544 (p-value =0.002), age [base is < 37] had HR 0.772 (p-value=0.008), ART regimen [base= First line] had HR 0.518 (p-value= 0.233) and differentiated care model (Base=not on DCM) had HR 0.77(p-value=0.036). In conclusion, in spite of the multiple interventions designed to address incidences of LTFU among HIV patients, within-person cases of LTFU are usually common and recurrent in nature, with the present likelihood of a person getting LTFU influenced by previous occurrences and therefore informative censoring should be checked

References

Huang C-Y, Wang M-C. Joint Modeling and Estimation for Recurrent Event Processes and Failure Time Data. J Am Stat Assoc 2004;99(468):1153-65. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001033

Chiou SH [Steven], Huang C-Y. reReg: Recurrent Event Regression [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 23]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=reReg

Lawless JF. Regression Methods for Poisson Process Data. J Am Stat Assoc 1987;82(399):808-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478502

Kelly PJ, Lim LL-Y. Survival analysis for recurrent event data: an application to childhood infectious diseases. Stat Med 2000;19(1):13-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5

Yang W, Jepson C, Xie D, Roy JA, Shou H, Hsu JY, et al. Statistical Methods for Recurrent Event Analysis in Cohort Studies of CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;12(12):2066-73. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12841216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.12841216

Andersen PK, Gill RD. Cox’s Regression Model for Counting Processes: A Large Sample Study. Ann Stat 1982;10(4):1100-20. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345976

Prentice RL, Williams BJ, Peterson AV. On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 1981;68(2):373-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.2.373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/68.2.373

Wei LJ, Lin DY, Weissfeld L. Regression Analysis of Multivariate Incomplete Failure Time Data by Modeling Marginal Distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1989;84(408):1065-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478873

Ghosh D, Lin DY. Semiparametric Analysis of Recurrent Events Data in the Presence of Dependent Censoring. Biometrics 2003;59(4):877-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00102.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00102.x

Christel Castelli, Philippe Saint-Pierre, Jean-Pierre Daures. Informative censoring in survival analysis and application to asthma | Christel Castelli | Request PDF [Internet]. ResearchGate. 2006 [cited 2019 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262413091_Informative_censoring_in_survival_analysis_and_application_to_asthma/citations

Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Accelerated Failure Time Models for Counting Processes. Biometrika 1998;85(3):605-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.3.605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.3.605

Berheto TM, Haile DB, Mohammed S. Predictors of Loss to follow-up in Patients Living with HIV/AIDS after Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy. North Am J Med Sci 2014;6(9):453-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.141636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.141636

Assemie MA, Muchie KF, Ayele TA. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow up among HIV-infected adults at Pawi General Hospital, northwest Ethiopia: competing risk regression model. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2018 May 10 [cited 2019 Jul 4];11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3407-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3407-5

Amorim LD, Cai J. Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44(1):324-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu222

Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer Science & Business Media 2000;p. 372. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8

Ullah S, Gabbett TJ, Finch CF. Statistical modelling for recurrent events: an application to sports injuries. Br J Sports Med 2014;48(17):1287-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090803

Odhiambo C, Odhiambo J, Omolo B. A Smooth Test of Goodness-of-Fit for the Baseline Hazard Function for Time-to-First Occurrence in Recurrent Events: An Application to HIV Retention Data. Int J Stat Med Res 2017;6(3):104-113. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2017.06.03.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2017.06.03.2

Downloads

Published

2020-03-29

How to Cite

Ejoku, J., Odhiambo, C., & Chaba, L. (2020). Analysis of Recurrent Events with Associated Informative Censoring: Application to HIV Data. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 9, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.03

Issue

Section

General Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)