Impact of Inclusive University Programs on the Development of Socio-Emotional Skills and Functional Autonomy in Students with Mild Cognitive Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2026.14.02.1Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Higher Education, Social-Emotional Development, Independent Living Skills, Intellectual Disability, Educational ProgramsAbstract
Background: Inclusive higher education has emerged as a critical pathway for strengthening functional independence and social integration among students with mild cognitive disabilities. Although access to university programs has expanded, empirical evidence on the effectiveness of inclusive educational interventions in promoting socio-emotional skills and functional autonomy remains limited. This study examined the impact of university-based inclusive programs on these key developmental outcomes.
Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected from final-year university students with mild cognitive disabilities who had participated in structured inclusive programs. A validated Likert-type questionnaire was used to measure socio-emotional skills and functional autonomy. Descriptive statistics were used to assess overall trends, while inferential analyses, including independent-samples t-tests and multiple regression, were conducted to examine group differences and predictive relationships.
Results: The findings indicated that inclusive university programs were associated with improvements in socio-emotional competencies, including self-regulation, interpersonal interaction, and decision-making, as well as in functional autonomy related to academic and everyday activities. However, the regression analysis showed that these variables did not significantly predict overall perceived program effectiveness, suggesting the influence of additional contextual and institutional factors.
Conclusions: University-based inclusive programs contribute positively to the development of socio-emotional skills and functional autonomy among students with mild cognitive disabilities. Nevertheless, their overall effectiveness appears to depend on a broader, integrative framework that includes academic support, social inclusion, and institutional resources. These findings provide relevant evidence for strengthening inclusive practices and policies in higher education.
References
Ushie GB, Akpo FA, Emogor EE, Wonah FA, Patrick EO, Anthony GB, et al. Effectiveness of university-based educational interventions on adaptive functioning and employment readiness of students with mild intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2026; 14(1): 28-43.
Hidalgo Montesinos KP. Systematic review of the organizational environment in public universities and its impact on educational quality. Minerva 2026; 7(19): 114-123.
Selau T, Marceliano SC, Schutz A, Bandeira DR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions in adaptive behavior for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2022; 10(5): 238-247.
Rachanioti E, Giaouri S, Laskaraki E, Alevriadou A. Can I work here? employment barriers for individuals with intellectual disabilities in Greece. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2021; 9(4): 354-362.
Morales-Martinez GE, Lopez-Ramirez EO, Villarreal-Treviño MG, Mezquita-Hoyos Y. Functional measurement of special education teachers’ and students’ expectations toward job training for persons with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2015; 3(1): 35-42.
O’Callaghan E, Leane M, Maxwell N, Busteed E. Inclusive higher education for people with intellectual disability: obligations for higher education institutions under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. High Educ 2025.
O’Donovan MA, Wedgwood N, Westermann G, Rillotta F, Aitken T. Personal, social and vocational outcomes of inclusive university for people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 2025; 69: 1448-1473.
Avellone L. Employment outcomes for students with intellectual disabilities in postsecondary education programs: a scoping review. J Postsecond Educ Disabil [Internet] 2021 [cited 2026 May 7]; 34(3): 223-238. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1325428
Mason CK, Anderson V, Bennett L, Gooney M, Kennedy S, Pembroke C. Exploring an inclusive educational program within higher education for individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Health Rehabil Sci [Internet] 2025 [cited 2026 May 7]; 4(2): 37-46. Available from: https://jhrs.eprints.almamater.si/id/eprint/65/1/05.%20%28p.37-46%29-Mason-JHRS-4-2.pdf
Mashwama NX, Omodan BI. Breaking barriers: a systematic review of inclusive practices in higher education for engineering students with disabilities. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res 2024; 23(7): 228-249.
Lamadrid Vela CA, Aguirre Reyes EM, Garavito Criollo RA, Lamadrid Aguirre CE. Influence of motivation on job satisfaction: evidence from educational management. Minerva 2025; 6(18): 70-77.
Grigal D, Hart L, Weir J. Think college national coordinating center: annual report on the transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities [Internet]. Boston: Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston 2012 [cited 2026 May 7]. Available from: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ici_pubs/192/
Whittenburg HN, Cimera RE, Willis C, Taylor JP, Thoma CA. Comparing employment outcomes for youth with learning disabilities and postsecondary educational experience. J Vocat Rehabil 2020; 52(3): 303-315.
Migliore A, Butterworth J, Hart D. Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for youth with intellectual disabilities. Think College Fast Facts [Internet] 2009 [cited 2026 May 7]; 1. Available from: https://thinkcollege.net/sites/default/files/files/resources/214_pse%20and%20employ%20outcomes%20fast%20facts.pdf
Enticott A, Dew A. A systematic review of the characteristics of programs and services resulting in competitive employment outcomes for young people with an intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2026; 51(1): 27-38.
Holwerda A, Van der Klink JJL, de Boer MR, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Predictors of work participation of young adults with mild intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil 2013; 34(6): 1982-1990.
Mittler P. Education for all or for some? Inclusive education and the challenge of disability [Internet]. ERIC; 1995 [cited 2026 May 7]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED394403
Alnahdi S, Schwab A. Inclusive education and quality of life for individuals with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2023; 11(2): 97-108.
Abrams K, McMahon D, Firestone J, Whittenburg H, Bruno L. Virtual reality for teaching science vocabulary to postsecondary education students with intellectual disability and autism. J Incl Postsecond Educ 2019; 6(1).
Woolf S, Woolf CM, Oakland T. Adaptive behavior among adults with intellectual disabilities and its relationship to community independence. Intellect Dev Disabil 2010; 48(3): 209-215.
Wehmeyer ML, Garner NW. The impact of personal characteristics of people with intellectual and developmental disability on self-determination and autonomous functioning. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2003; 16: 255-265.
Chao PC, Chou YC, Cheng SF. Self-determination and transition outcomes of youth with disabilities: findings from the special needs education longitudinal study. Adv Neurodev Disord 2019; 3: 129-137.
Papayannis M, Laskaraki E, Alevriadou A. Transition to adulthood and employment for individuals with intellectual disabilities: challenges and perspectives. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 2020; 8(3): 250-258.
Diaz Delgado JI, Juarez Dominguez FP, Llontop Ruiz LK, Llontop Ruiz SP. Assessing the impact of technology on inclusive registry services. Minerva 2025; 6(18): 119-128.
Banda Perez JW, Banda Sanchez DR, Mendoza Banda TY. Effective strategies for online education: a systematic literature review. Minerva 2025; 6(18): 148-156.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
