Lifescience Global

Editor’s Choice : Comparison of Maternal Feeding Practices and Child Weight Status in Children from Three Countries

International Journal of Child Health and Nutrition

Comparison of Maternal Feeding Practices and Child Weight Status in Children from Three Countries
Pages 67-77
Maria Luiza Blanques Petty, Maria Arlete M. Schimith-Escrivão, Kyong-Mee Chung, Woo Hyun Jung, Helen M. Hendy and Keith E. Williams

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4247.2014.03.02.1

Published: 30 May 2014

 


Abstract: The present study considered three samples of mothers from Brazil, South Korea, and the United States to determine whether mothers demonstrate a consistent pattern of feeding practices associated with child overweight. Participants included 1204 mothers of children 6-10 years old.

Mothers completed questionnaires to report their children's demographics and their feeding practices with the Parent Mealtime Action Scale (PMAS). The South Korean children showed significantly less obesity (10.4%) than children from Brazil (17.0%) or the United States (19.6%). Confirmatory factor analysis for mothers from all three samples revealed good fit for the same nine PMAS dimensions of feeding practice. Hierarchical multiple regression revealed that after taking into account child age and gender, heavier child weight was found associated with more Fat Reduction and less Insistence on Eating by mothers from all three samples. Results from past experimental research suggest that these two maternal feeding practices would be counter-productive for teaching children's self-regulation of diet and weight management. Alternative maternal feeding practices are suggested.

Keywords: Childhood obesity, parent-child relations, feeding practices, obesity prevention, weight management.
Download Full Article
Submit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

OUR STRENGTHS

♦  Worldwide readership
♦  High quality content
♦  Maximum visibility
♦  Efficient publishing
♦  Optional Open Access

Publish your Research

Survey

As an author what type of publishing model you prefer?

780
Open Access
493
Optional Open Access
338
Subscription based
5 Votes left